New crime state suggests​ that London is more dangerous than New York City.

According to the Telegraph London is now more crime ridden and dangerous than New York City, with rape, robbery and violent offences far higher on this side of the Atlantic. New statistics show that there is 13% more crime in the UK than previously. Both London and New York have approximately 8 million inhabitants, yet you are six times more likely to be burgled in London than New York.

The President of the United States, Donald Trump, is of course very happy as this puts him in a good light.

Skjermbilde 2018-04-12 kl. 10.17.45.png

He claimes the Muslims for the increase in crimes, while criminal justice experts, on the other hand, insist that the reason for the rising crime has to do with the way the British Police works. Both police departments have just over 30 000 officers and a budget around 3 billion pounds a year. But compared to each other, the two police forces in the global cities use different tactics to decrease today’s numbers.

Donald Trump might like to take the credit for the decrease in crimes, but it as actually the previous police commissioner, Bill Bratton and Mayor Rudy Giuliani that introduced a zero tolerance approach to low level crime together with flooding problem areas with patrols in New York which decreased the crime rates of New York.







School Shooting- to be continued

On February 14, 2018, a mass shooting occurred at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. Seventeen people were murdered and fourteen more were taken to hospitals, making it one of the world’s deadliest school massacres.

Skjermbilde 2018-03-01 kl. 12.37.08.png

The Marjory Stoneman Douglas shooting is the 6th school shooting resulting in injuries this year. According to gun control group Everytown USA, there have been 17 incidents of gunfire in schools this year. This shooting stroke a fear into all Americans, and many people are demanding gun control. The survivors of the mass shooting participated in a protest, and more than 100 of them are planning on visiting the state capital to speak with state lawmakers. They have also announced their upcoming “March of our Lives” which will take place in Washinton, D.C, and several cities around the country.

Students like Emma Gonsalez, have criticized politicians like President Donald Trump, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and Florida Gov. Rick Scott for accepting donations from the National Rifle Association. She gave a … speech about this. One of the points with the upcoming march is to raise awareness about lawmakers who have received donations from the NRA and hold them accountable for the mass shootings in the U.S.

Former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords is also calling on Congress to enact stricter gun control legislation. Skjermbilde 2018-03-01 kl. 12.43.47.pngSkjermbilde 2018-03-01 kl. 12.43.59.png

According to the Time, Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy, who has become a vocal advocate for gun control legislation in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in his state, said:

“This happens no where else other than the United States of America, this epidemic of mass slaughter, this scourge of school shooting after school shooting,” he said. “It only happens here — not because of coincidence, not because of bad luck, but as a consequence of our inaction. We are responsible for a level of mass atrocity that happens in this country with zero parallel anywhere else.”



Skjermbilde 2018-03-01 kl. 12.37.39.png


A walk for democracy- to be continued ​

On March 7, 1965, state troopers viciously attacked non-violent civil rights marchers in Selma, Alabama. Look back at the events of “Bloody Sunday” that shaken millions of Americans and galvanized Congress to pass the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Almost a century after the Confederacy’s guns fell silent, the racial legacies of slavery and Reconstruction still reverberated loudly throughout Alabama in 1965. Even the passage of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 months earlier had done little to the discrimination against African Americans. This made it difficult for them to register to vote, although it now was a basic right. There was possibly no place where Jim Crow’s gripped tighter than in Dallas County, where African Americans made up more than half of the population. Interestingly, they were accounted for only 2 percent of registered voters.

John Lewis stand on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alamaba, almost 50 years after the brutal events of “Bloody Sunday”

It started as a peaceful demonstration outside the courthouse in Selma, Alabama, but resulted in the arrest of thousands. In a letter written to The New York Times in February 1965, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote: “There are more negroes in jail with me than there are on the voting rolls”. The racial tention increased when state troopers shot Jimmie Lee Jackson, a 26-year-ols demonstrator who tried to protect his mother as she was being struck by the police. In response, the civil rights leaders, such as King and Lewis, planned to take their cause directly to the Alabama Gouvernor on a 54-mile march from Selma to the state capital of Montgomery. Even though Gouvernor Wallace ordered the state troopers “to use whatever measures are necessary to prevent a march,” 600 marchers startet to walk towards Montgomery. The voting rights advocates walked undisturbed though Selma, but as they becan to cross the bridge which connected Selma to Montgomery, they met trouble. A wall of state troopers stood ready to attack, with the Confederate general and reputed grand dragon of the Alabama Ku Klux Klan, Edmund Pettus, in front. They knocked the marchers to the ground since the protestors did not fight back. hith-selma-corbis-AP650307075-AB.jpeg

From Bloody Sunday

Martin Luther King Jr. leads the protersters through another march to the Edmund Pettus Bridge, but this time people from all around America came to participate. In contrast to the first march, there was no attack; the crowd turned back at the barricade of state troopers.

August 6. 1965 President Lyndon Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Without the events in Selma, African Americans wouldn’t be a part of the American democracy. This march is so significance in American history that it has been reenacted many times on it’s anniversary. On the 50th anniversery of the march former President Barack Obama joined thousants of Americans in Selma. This was very special as Obama would possibly wouldn’t have been elected President if it wasn’t for these events. The First Family waits with former President George W. Bush, former First Lady Laura Bush prior to the walking across the Edmund Pettus Bridge

Nevertheless, even with the success, great challenges still remain. That is why the legacy of Selma must not be viewed in the vacuum of history, but rather as an inspiration for our future. As President Obama put it on the 50th anniversary of “Bloody Sunday”:

“[Selma] is instead the manifestation of a creed written into our founding documents: ‘We the People…in order to form a more perfect union.’ ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.’” Souce The White House





Black lives matters

As we are reading the book “The Hat U Give” we are also looking into the international activist movement Black Lives Matter. The campaign made its’ mark on social media in 2013 after the acquittal of George Zimmerman, a man who shot the unarmed African-American Trayvon Martin. It all began with the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter, and today BLM are regularly holding protest speaking out against police killings of black people and racial inequality.

Three women were all we needed. Alicia Garza was one of the people who shared their feelings on Facebook regarding the acquittal of Martin’s murder. She posted: “Our lives matter, black lives matter”. Patrice Cullors then replied with the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter. Opal Tometi was the third women to show her support with the same hashtag. Since then it has become the banner under which dozens of disparate organizations, millions of people, loosely and tightly related, press for change. The campaign continued to spread as several police killings have occurred. In fact, the slogan of the movement was created when another story was shared: Eric Garner was killed by NYPD-officer with a chokehold. Garner screamed “I can’t breathe” about eleven times before he died. Ever since his words have covered clothes and posters worldwide.

The BLM movement is a powerful example of the social revolution we are a part of. Social media is not only for posting pretty pictures of our “perfect” lives. It is also a platform for discussing issues like racial inequalities. The internet is a unique tool for reaching out with an important message fast and far. Only on Instagram, the hashtag has been used 6 668 883. Everything is one keystroke away, which makes it possible for people in every corner of the world able to participate in the movement. Ordinary citizens are able to tell their own stories. Black Lives Matter activist Ashley Yates says: “Social media has given people on the ground a voice and a validation as a trusted source.” (Media)

Even though this is great, social media also has a dark side. Harassment, threats, and insults are basic hazards of online activism today and this campaign was not an exception. The movement has faced a lot of criticism. Some argue that it is a protest against anti-police. Others believe it is unfair that the lights only are shining on black victims. As a response, the phrase “All Lives Matter” sprang out. But the core of the case is not about whether or not you are black or white, it is about police officers abusing their power. It is a protest suggesting that the system is failing.


Scotland + Brexit = Scoxit?

The 2016 referendum which decided whether the UK would leave or remain in the European Union has turned the UK upside down. With more than 30 million votes, 51,9% backed Brexit and 48.1% was against. The breakdown across the UK however, shows otherwise. Scotland, for example, voted Remain by 62% to 38% BBC. Clearly,  Brexit is lacking in general approval from the Scottish people. In light of a new analysis predicting Scotlands future, SNP politician Nicola Sturgeon is suggesting a second referendum. Is Scotland facing a constitutional crisis?

Neither the UK government or anyone else, including the Scotish government, have a strategy for Brexit. The only thing that seems to be certain these days are that Brexit will have a huge impact on the UK’s economy, and not for the better. The paper analyzed the potential impact of three scenarios: EEA membership, a Canada-style free-trade agreement, and reverting to basic WTO rules. Sturgeon said every option would involve a “hit to the economy”.

In case of a “hard” Brexit, the UK will have to operate under the World Trade Organisation rules. The Scottish government report shows that this will result in an 8% decrease in the UK’s economy. Additionally, it would alone cost Scotland up to £12.7 billion, as well as cause real household incomes to fall by 9,6% (£2,263 per head). On the contrary, due to the intensification of digital industries, energy, and services, the UK economy will possibly result in an increase of 2.4% if they remain a part of EU’s single market (The Guardian).

First minister Sturgeon believes it is “democratically unacceptable” that Scotland is forced to leave the EU when they voted to Remain BBC. The report highly strengthens the arguments for staying within the single market. This way, the Scottish independence referendum is flourishing once again, creating indyref2. Last time, in 2014, 55% of the Scottish population voted against Scottish independence. However, this time the tables might be turned seeing as the Scottish people clearly wanted to remain as a part of the EU. If that were to happen it would most likely create a chain of independence referendums throughout the UK.




Northern Ireland and Brexit

Written by Ingrid, Benedicte and Rebekka

Elaborate on and discuss how key historical events and processes have affected the development of  British society.

Write an article on your blog using material from the PowerPoint presentation to explain why this is a controversial issue today. Be sure to include historical facts, the process of Brexit and the views and concerns from both sides of the border. Be sure to list your sources.

The conflict in Northern Ireland during the late 20th century is known as The Troubles. Over 3600 people were murdered and thousands injured. At the heart of the conflict lay the constitutional status of Northern Ireland. The conflict has its roots in “the irish question”. “The irish question” was used to describe Irish nationalism and the calls for Irish independence. The goal of the unionist and overwhelmingly Protestant majority was to remain part of the United Kingdom. The goal of the nationalist and republican, almost exclusively Catholic, minority was to become part of the Republic of Ireland. The conflict was based on two different visions of national identity and national belonging.

This lead to actual fighting, including killings uprisings, violence and revenge: The Troubles.

The two enemies in the conflict started cross-parting-talking in the beginning of 1996, and in 1998 the two parts officially ended The Troubles. President of the United States at the time, Bill Clinton, took an active personal role during the negotiations. He pointed out veteran US senator George Mitchell as chair of the talks process that today is referred to as the Good Friday Agreement or the Belfast agreement. The agreement created a number of institutions between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, and between the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom. The agreement was made up of two inter-related documents, both agreed in Belfast on Good Friday;

  1. A multi-party agreement by most of Northern Ireland’s political parties (the Multi-Party Agreement)
  2. An international agreement between the British and Irish governments (the British-Irish Agreement)

This whole agreement led to major changes in the Northern Ireland politics. An assembly was set up which made many political decisions affecting people in Northern Ireland for the better. The assembly has members from all sides of the community. The Good Friday Agreement also marked a shift in Northern Ireland’s political landscape. The UUP and SDLP agreed to accept power-sharing, including with former paramilitaries who were committed to the peace process.

Even though there’s been pretty peaceful between the two parts, there are still fears that violence is returning, especially in areas where Protestants and Catholics live closely together. Since 2007, Northern Ireland has had a stable internal government where former enemies cooperate to make sure that the province will avoid falling into the pitfalls of the past. In 2015, six Irish men were arrested by the police after they discovered bomb-making equipment close to where the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall were due to visit.

The border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland is one of the main issues regarding Brexit as it is the only point where the UK will continue to meet the EU. As the UK is leaving the EU they are also leaving the customs union. This means that Northern Ireland will have different trade regulations to Ireland which would require a border. If a hard border is created many people are afraid to feel like they are back in the time of The Troubles, and they fear that a greater division between the two countries will rise. A border does not have to mean a hard border however, it will mean barriers, checks, queues, papers, regulations, and tariffs. This can become an obstacle for the 30 000 people who cross the border everyday (Connal Parr and Edward Burke, 2017). Additionally, Ireland is by far Northern Ireland’s largest external trading partner, accounting for nearly 30 percent of its trade in goods (Financial Times, 2017). According to data from Northern Ireland Statistics & Research Agency, goods make up 81 percent of Northern Irish export to the Republic. And food and live animals account for the largest share of trade with Ireland.

Skjermbilde 2018-01-11 kl. 12.20.55.png



“The hate u give”, my first impression

We have started to read a new book in English. The book looks at police violence, especially against afro-Americans, through the eyes of a teenage girl named Starr. Her life suddenly becomes more complicated as her best friend Khalil is shot and killed by a police officer. I find the book very interesting because I believe this is a highly important issue which is necessary to bring to debate as it, unfortunately, still happens several places. Additionally, the book is quite easy to read which makes me motivated to continue reading.

In the beginning of the book, Starr and Khalil are driving from a party. They get pulled up by an officer. The police officer says:

“Okay, smart mouth, let’s see what we find on you today”

I believe the problem with police violence begins with communication, as this quote is an example of. When the police officer is talking to Khalil like he is above him, Khalil feels disrespected and does not want to cooperate. He, therefore, refuses to obey the officer’s command, which results in a gutshot. The book continues to debate this topic, and I am excited to read more.